Karki was removed as IGP through a Cabinet decision on November 4, which simultaneously named Additional Inspector General Manoj Kumar KC as the 34th Nepal Police chief. The former police chief says he was dismissed before completing his term and was not given a fair opportunity to answer the allegations or reasons behind the government’s move.
Relief sought in court
In his petition, Karki has asked the Supreme Court to annul the decision that transferred him to the post of special security adviser to the prime minister. He is also seeking restoration to the IGP position for the remaining period of his official tenure.
The former police chief has requested an interim order to halt the implementation of the Cabinet decision and any follow-up actions. He wants the court to allow him to remain in office as IGP and to prevent KC from taking charge of the position while the dispute is being examined.
Arguments against removal
Karki maintains that the government’s action breached the principles of natural justice, as he was removed without being heard or given an opportunity to defend himself. He further argues that his position had not legally fallen vacant, so the appointment of a new police chief was invalid.
Next stage
The Supreme Court has registered the case but has not yet issued an interim order. Reports say the hearing has been set for November 16, meaning the court’s immediate response to Karki’s request for interim relief may come after the holiday period.
The outcome will have significant implications for the leadership of Nepal Police, as it will determine whether Karki returns to the IGP post or whether KC remains in office. The case also raises broader questions about the legal process required before a sitting police chief can be removed.
